最近更新：2026-03-31
2026-cv-02833
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 03/16/2026 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4]. The Court, like many other courts in this District, is unconvinced that "these commonplace efforts in Schedule A cases to obtain secret relief comport with principles of procedural due process." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.); see also Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co. LTD. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, 25-cv-09559 Dkt. No. 10 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 19, 2025) (Hunt, J.). As an initial matter, these infringement cases rarely present exceptional circumstances that would justify sealing the names of all defendants and documents pertaining to their alleged infringing activity, let alone an entire case, even temporarily. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightholders' IP interests by obtaining an injunction against defendants' sales of infringing or counterfeit goods." Eicher Motors, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7. And, importantly, the reasoning underlying Plaintiff's motion to seal runs counter to the well-established authority of this Circuit holding that "[m]any a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing." See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000). It is insufficient that alleged counterfeiters might quickly shut down the online store and move money if alerted to the fact that they are being sued. See Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co., 25-cv-09559 Dkt. No. 10. "Due process still affords them the right to receive notice and a chance to present a defense before restraining all of their assets based solely on one-sided documentary evidence from Plaintiff." Id. Therefore, without a detailed explanation to establish good cause for sealing in accordance with Local Rule 26.2 and Seventh Circuit precedent, which has not been provided here, sealing is not appropriate. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to seal [4] is denied, and the Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the entire case, forthwith. Mailed notice. |
| 03/16/2026 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 5/30/2026, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice. |
| 03/13/2026 | Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Stussy, Inc. |
| 03/13/2026 | AMENDED complaint by Stussy, Inc. against lina89_337 and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 03/13/2026 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 03/13/2026 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 03/13/2026 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. by Madeline Halgren |
| 03/13/2026 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. by Kahlia Roe Halpern |
| 03/13/2026 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler |
| 03/13/2026 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 03/13/2026 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Stussy, Inc. |
| 03/13/2026 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Stussy, Inc. |
| 03/13/2026 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 03/13/2026 | MOTION by Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. for leave to file under Seal |
| 03/13/2026 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding complaint[1] |
| 03/13/2026 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Stussy, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 03/13/2026 | COMPLAINT filed by Stussy, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24846622. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
