最近更新：无记录
2024-cv-05737
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 04/01/2025 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 02/26/2025 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 12/19/2024 | FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 12/19/2024. Mailed notice |
| 12/19/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 64 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's marks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Plaintiff has also certified and established 68 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the objection deadline, but no objection to the motion for entry of default judgment has been filed on behalf of any remaining defendant. Because no default judgment hearing has been requested, the default judgment hearing tentatively set for 12/24/2024 is stricken. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond posted in the amount of thirty-one thousand dollar ($31,000) to Plaintiff's counsel, Michael A. Hierl of Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. at Three First National Plaza, 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60602. Enter separate Final Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice |
| 12/13/2024 | LETTER from Nattapong W. (Received via pro se email on 12/13/2024). (jn,) |
| 12/13/2024 | LETTER from Nattapong W. (Received via pro se email on 12/13/2024). (jn,) |
| 12/13/2024 | LETTER from Nattapong W. (Received via pro se email on 12/13/2024). (jn,) |
| 12/12/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Certain Defendants |
| 12/11/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery |
| 12/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 64 for entry of default and default judgment against all remaining defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 12/18/2024. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 12/18/2024. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative default judgment hearing is set for 12/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Telephone status hearing set for 12/18/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice |
| 12/11/2024 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment, 64 附件： 1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1) |
| 12/11/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery in support of motion for default judgment, 64 附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 12/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 11/14/2024 | NEW PARTIES: Yiwu Mengqiu E-Commerce Firm, Yiwu KM Crafts Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Conris Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Lianyungang Yuzongwang International Trade Co., Ltd., Xihou Trading, henan sugudianzishangwu youxian gongsi, zta7_53, yanz1520, xiuying1-hfhzhe, wonatta, wedding4426, shang-fn4, oqrzj_36, new_beauty7, majfmfu69, liannao16, home-lifehao, ha-smile-5, flyone-6, Nanchang Yong Guan Trading Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Linke International Trade Co., Ltd., zmny169, ubigface, muou_h, miss_you18, mark-shop-week, lskoc858, jewelry-apple, eveningstore_f and candy.bean-4 added to case caption. |
| 11/08/2024 | LETTER from Nattapong. (Exhibits). (Received via pro se email on 11/08/24). |
| 11/12/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 11/12/2024. Mailed notice |
| 11/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 53 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 58 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any remaining defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Because no preliminary injunction hearing has been requested, the preliminary injunction hearing tentatively set for 11/13/2024 is stricken. Summons was issued on 11/6/2024, and Defendants' responses to the complaint are due by 11/27/2024. Plaintiff should file any motion for entry of default and default judgment by 12/11/2024. If there are any remaining defendants whom default and default judgment are not being sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report identifying each defendant against whom this case is proceeding and state whether the parties anticipate a settlement or further litigation. A telephone status hearing is set for 12/18/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice |
| 11/07/2024 | LETTER from Nattapong W. (Received via pro se email on 11/7/2024) |
| 11/07/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Robert Payton Mcmurray on behalf of Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery |
| 11/07/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto on 11/6/2024, answer due 11/27/2024. |
| 11/06/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 53 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 11/8/2024." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 11/8/2024. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Telephone status hearing set for 11/13/2024 at 9:15 a.m. is converted to a tentative preliminary injunction hearing. Mailed notice |
| 11/06/2024 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 53 |
| 11/06/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery in support of motion for preliminary injunction 53 |
| 11/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction |
| 11/06/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 10/23/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 51 is granted. For the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Motion, the Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 11/13/2024. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 11/6/2024. Telephone status hearing set for 10/30/2024 is stricken and reset to 11/13/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 10/23/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order |
| 10/17/2024 | INJUNCTION BOND in the amount of $ 31,000.00 posted by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery. (Document not scanned). (Received at the Intake Counter on 10/17/24). |
| 10/16/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 10/16/2024. Mailed notice |
| 10/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation 44 and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process 45 are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit products, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. The Court presumptively requires a bond of $1,000 per defendant. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order at 12:15 p.m. on 10/16/2024. Plaintiff shall file the TRO extension motion (or a preliminary injunction motion) if appropriate no later than 10/23/2024. Telephone status hearing is set for 10/30/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice |
| 10/15/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery Exhibit 2 to d'AGAY Declaration |
| 10/15/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 45 附件： 1:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4) 2:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 5:Declaration Hierl Declaration 6:Exhibit 1 7:Declaration d'AGAY Declaration |
| 10/15/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 10/15/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
| 10/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Status Report 42. Plaintiff shall file its Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and related relief against the remaining Defendants by 10/16/2024. Mailed notice |
| 10/09/2024 | STATUS Report by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery |
| 09/30/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case by 10/9/2024. Mailed notice |
| 09/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint 36 and Memorandum in Support of Joinder 38 as directed. At this preliminary stage and in the absence of adversarial presentation, the Court finds that joinder of 31 Defendants is proper at this time and this case may now proceed. Moreover, no defendants will be prejudiced by permitting joinder at this juncture. See Bose Corp. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 511, 517 (N.D. Ill. 2020). To the extent any defendant appears and objects to joinder, the Court will revisit the issue and is free to sever certain defendants from the case under Rule 21 at that time. Id. Plaintiff shall refile the motion for entry of temporary restraining order which was denied without prejudice, edited as needed for the Amended Complaint and Amended Schedule A. Mailed notice. |
| 09/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery Exhibit AA |
| 09/06/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 09/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery |
| 09/06/2024 | AMENDED complaint by Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 08/30/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support of Joinder 34 is granted. An Amended Complaint and a Memorandum in Support of Joinder of a smaller subset of Defendants identified in Schedule A is due by 9/6/2024. Mailed notice |
| 08/30/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Societe Pour L'Oeuvre et La Memoire D'Antoine De Saint Exupery for extension of time Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 08/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 31 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 166 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"); H-D U.S.A. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 780486, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 2021) ("The Seventh Circuit has recognized the broad discretion that district courts have in remedying misjoinder, so long as the court's decision avoids unnecessary harm to the parties."). The Court observes that plaintiff's memorandum includes a fair amount of conclusory language about a logical relationship among all defendants but not much, if any, facts to actually support that relationship. Beyond alleging that the 166 defendants are infringing upon plaintiff's trademarks, plaintiff claims only generally that joinder is proper because, inter alia, the defendants: use common design elements, offer similar counterfeit products for sale, omit contact information or other information for identifying Defendants, offer no credible information regarding their physical addresses, use the same advertising and marketing strategies to target consumers while attempting to evade enforcement, and have virtually identical website layouts; the counterfeit products "bare similar irregularities and indicia of being counterfeit to one another" suggesting they "were manufactured by and come from a common sources;" and defendant stores have "other notable common features, including use of the same online marketplace account registration patterns, unique shopping cart platforms, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, meta data, illegitimate SEO tactics, HADJL user-defined variables, domain redirection, lack of contact information, identical or similarly priced similar hosting services, similar name serves, and the use of the same text and images." (Doc.12-1, ¶ 14; Doc. 30 at 4, 11). But plaintiff provides no specific examples of such shared features or similar irregularities and instead the record contains Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Olivier d'AGAY (which includes 1481 pages of screenshots from defendants' listings) without providing the Court with specific additional information from those listings that might in fact support joinder in this matter. See Docs. 13-28. It is not this Court's job to sift through hundreds of pages of materials to look for a relationship between the defendants. Moreover, "defendants with nearly identical product descriptions may in fact share no ties, with each simply copying the same description from elsewhere." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd., et al. v. The Partnerships, et al., No. 20-cv-00845 (N.D. Ill. June 22, 2020) (Lee, J.) (Doc. 40 at 9); see also Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 188. Within its discretion, on this record, the Court finds that plaintiff has failed to meet its burden to show that joinder is proper here. See Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021) (holding similar conclusory statements do not support joinder); H-D U.S.A., 2021 WL 780486, at *3 (finding joinder improper where plaintiff failed to allege "any nonconclusory facts to form a basis for a conclusion that the defendants' conduct overlaps enough to warrant joinder"). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 11 and motion to exceed page limitation 10 are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 7 is granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others by 8/30/2024. Mailed notice |
| 08/08/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The joinder issue remains under advisement. Telephone status hearing set for 8/13/2024 is stricken.Mailed notice |
| 07/29/2024 | MEMORANDUM by SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 07/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 7, plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation 10, and motion for temporary restraining order 11 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of over 165 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 7/30/2024, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. A telephone status hearing is set for 8/13/2024 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 07/11/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 16 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 15 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 14 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 13 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 12 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 11 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 10 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 9 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 8 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 7 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 6 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 5 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 4 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 3 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 2 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Exhibit 2 Part 1 of d'Agay Declaration |
| 07/11/2024 | MEMORANDUM by SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 11 附件： 1:Declaration d'Agay Declaration 2:Exhibit 1 3:Declaration Hierl Declaration 4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 6:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3 7:(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4) |
| 07/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 07/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
| 07/09/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY |
| 07/09/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY Sealed Schedule A |
| 07/09/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 07/09/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY by John Wilson |
| 07/09/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 07/09/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 07/09/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY by Michael A. Hierl |
| 07/09/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 07/09/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by SOCIETE POUR L'OEUVRE ET LA MEMOIRE D'ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY - SUCCESSION DE SAINT EXUPERY-D'AGAY; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22219336. 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
