最近更新：2025-09-15
2025-cv-10259
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/31/2025 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. |
| 10/28/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's motion for electronic service [16] is granted. The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery [18]. That is, the Court grants Plaintiff's request for electronic discovery related to Defendant's contact information and additional Seller Aliases, but denies the request as to information related to Defendant's alleged "hacking and data manipulation of [Plaintiff's] product item data." R. 18 at 2. The Court finds this latter information is more appropriately addressed in the regular course of discovery. Mailed notice. |
| 10/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO and other relief [12][13] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.) ("Given that any irreparable harm wrought by infringement can, as with more traditional forms of IP litigation, be addressed through preliminary injunctive relief following an adversarial proceeding, the use of Rule 65(b) to ensure an unimpeded path to a prejudgment asset restraint is unsound."). The Court acknowledges that it has granted similar TRO motions in earlier Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 25-cv-08835 Dkt. 22 (Aug. 19, 2025). However, upon further consideration of the issue, including a review of Judge Kness's thorough Order in Eicher Motors, the Court finds that the present TRO request, and other similar requests, do not satisfy Rule 65(b)'s requirements. Plaintiff may be allowed to request electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) and to seek discovery to assist with identifying defendant, but any such requests must be presented in a separate motion. Mailed notice. |
| 10/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO and other relief [12][13] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.) ("Given that any irreparable harm wrought by infringement can, as with more traditional forms of IP litigation, be addressed through preliminary injunctive relief following an adversarial proceeding, the use of Rule 65(b) to ensure an unimpeded path to a prejudgment asset restraint is unsound."). The Court acknowledges that it has granted similar TRO motions in earlier Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 25-cv-08835 Dkt. 22 (Aug. 19, 2025). However, upon further consideration of the issue, including a review of Judge Kness's thorough Order in Eicher Motors, the Court finds that the present TRO request, and other similar requests, do not satisfy Rule 65(b)'s requirements. Plaintiff may be allowed to request electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) and to seek discovery to assist with identifying defendant, but any such requests must be presented in a separate motion. Mailed notice. |
| 10/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO and other relief [12][13] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.) ("Given that any irreparable harm wrought by infringement can, as with more traditional forms of IP litigation, be addressed through preliminary injunctive relief following an adversarial proceeding, the use of Rule 65(b) to ensure an unimpeded path to a prejudgment asset restraint is unsound."). The Court acknowledges that it has granted similar TRO motions in earlier Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 25-cv-08835 Dkt. 22 (Aug. 19, 2025). However, upon further consideration of the issue, including a review of Judge Kness's thorough Order in Eicher Motors, the Court finds that the present TRO request, and other similar requests, do not satisfy Rule 65(b)'s requirements. Plaintiff may be allowed to request electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) and to seek discovery to assist with identifying defendant, but any such requests must be presented in a separate motion. Mailed notice. |
| 10/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO and other relief [12][13] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.) ("Given that any irreparable harm wrought by infringement can, as with more traditional forms of IP litigation, be addressed through preliminary injunctive relief following an adversarial proceeding, the use of Rule 65(b) to ensure an unimpeded path to a prejudgment asset restraint is unsound."). The Court acknowledges that it has granted similar TRO motions in earlier Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 25-cv-08835 Dkt. 22 (Aug. 19, 2025). However, upon further consideration of the issue, including a review of Judge Kness's thorough Order in Eicher Motors, the Court finds that the present TRO request, and other similar requests, do not satisfy Rule 65(b)'s requirements. Plaintiff may be allowed to request electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) and to seek discovery to assist with identifying defendant, but any such requests must be presented in a separate motion. Mailed notice. |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order Memorandum in Support |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order Memorandum in Support |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order Memorandum in Support |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order Memorandum in Support |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order |
| 09/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC for temporary restraining order |
| 09/12/2025 | REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475, 7 |
| 09/12/2025 | REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475, 7 |
| 09/12/2025 | REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475, 7 |
| 09/12/2025 | REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475, 7 |
| 09/11/2025 | Memorandum Supporting Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Memorandum Supporting Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Memorandum Supporting Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Memorandum Supporting Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | Motion for Electronic Service by Tub Works, LLC |
| 09/11/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Tub Works, LLC against Chibishi Yuanlai E-Commerce Ltd. and terminating The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A to the complaint 附件： 1:Supplement Amended Schedule A 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 3:Exhibit Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit Exhibit 3 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 4) |
| 09/11/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Tub Works, LLC against Chibishi Yuanlai E-Commerce Ltd. and terminating The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A to the complaint 附件： 1:Supplement Amended Schedule A 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 3:Exhibit Exhibit 3 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 4) |
| 09/11/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Tub Works, LLC against Chibishi Yuanlai E-Commerce Ltd. and terminating The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A to the complaint 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 2 2:Supplement Amended Schedule A 3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit Exhibit 3 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 4) |
| 09/11/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Tub Works, LLC against Chibishi Yuanlai E-Commerce Ltd. and terminating The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A to the complaint 附件： 1:Supplement Amended Schedule A 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 3:Exhibit Exhibit 2 4:Exhibit Exhibit 3 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 4) |
| 09/11/2025 | REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475 |
| 09/11/2025 | REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475 |
| 09/11/2025 | REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475 |
| 09/11/2025 | REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 405, receipt no. AILNDC-23951475 |
| 09/08/2025 | ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/8/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 09/08/2025 | ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/8/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 09/08/2025 | ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/8/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 09/08/2025 | ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Order, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for misjoinder. Enter Order. By 09/22/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 9/8/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 08/28/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 08/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 08/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 08/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 08/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 08/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 08/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 08/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 08/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 08/27/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Tub Works, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23951725. 附件： 1:Civil Cover Sheet 2:Supplement Schedule A 3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 3) |
| 08/27/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Tub Works, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23951725. 附件： 1:Civil Cover Sheet 2:Supplement Schedule A 3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 3) |
| 08/27/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Tub Works, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23951725. 附件： 1:Civil Cover Sheet 2:Supplement Schedule A 3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 3) |
| 08/27/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Tub Works, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23951725. 附件： 1:Civil Cover Sheet 2:Supplement Schedule A 3:Exhibit Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit Exhibit 3) |
| 08/27/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC by John Gibson |
| 08/27/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC by John Gibson |
| 08/27/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC by John Gibson |
| 08/27/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tub Works, LLC by John Gibson |
