最近更新：2025-05-29
2025-cv-05915
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 08/21/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD |
| 07/01/2025 | MEMORANDUM |
| 06/24/2025 | RECEIVED Document(s) by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD (Forwarded to Executive Committee) |
| 06/23/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD to seal document Exhibit C of Complaint |
| 06/23/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD to seal document Exhibit B of Complaint |
| 06/23/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD to seal document |
| 06/23/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD for leave to file |
| 06/17/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD |
| 06/16/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to refile, 14, is granted. A refiled Schedule A and Exhibit B are due by 6/23/2025. |
| 06/12/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD for leave to file |
| 06/11/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's status report, 12, which "requests the Court's guidance on how best to proceed," id. at 2. The court cannot give any party legal advice; ultimately, the parties are responsible for deciding how to litigate the case. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 6/18/2025, addressing how plaintiff seeks to proceed in this litigation. |
| 06/09/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD |
| 06/05/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to reconsider, 10, is denied. Plaintiff's motion argues that the court's order denying the request for a temporary restraining order, 7, overlooked Exhibit B to its complaint, [2-2], which it argues establish personal jurisdiction over defendants. However, Exhibit B was stricken from the docket as improperly filed under seal without leave of court, 8, and thus was not properly before the court and thus could not be used as the basis for a finding of personal jurisdiction. Although plaintiff has now filed an unsealed copy of Exhibit B, see [10-3], "[a] party may not use a motion for reconsideration to introduce new evidence that could have been presented earlier." Oto v. Metro Life Ins. Co., 224 F.3d 601, 606 (7th Cir. 2000). Moreover, the court notes that plaintiff's Schedule A, [2-1], was also stricken, 8. The absence of any properly-filed list of defendants in this case means that there are currently no defendants for the court to enjoin, which provides an independent basis to deny a temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)(2) (defining those bound by a temporary restraining order in terms of the parties). |
| 06/04/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD to reassign case, MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., LTD for reconsideration 附件： 1:Supplement Memorandum of Law 2:Declaration 3:(Exhibit B) |
| 06/02/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 6/10/2025, addressing how plaintiff seeks to proceed with this litigation. |
| 06/02/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's sealed documents, 2, [2-1], [2-2], [2-3], which were filed under seal without the court's permission, are stricken. See Local Rule 26.2(c)(3). |
| 06/02/2025 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/2/2025: |
| 06/02/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, 4, is denied. Enter Order. |
| 05/29/2025 | MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 05/28/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 05/28/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 05/28/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff SHENZHEN SHINING BRIGHT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, for temporary restraining order 附件： 1:(Supplement) |
| 05/28/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 05/28/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SHENZHEN SHINING BRIGHT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD 附件： 1:Exhibit B 2:(Exhibit C) 3:Appendix |
| 05/28/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by SHENZHEN SHINING BRIGHT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23541261. 附件： 1:(Exhibit C) 2:Exhibit B 3:Exhibit A 4:Appendix |
