最近更新：2025-03-07
2025-cv-01877
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 03/25/2025 | MAILED copyright report with a copy of minute entry [25] to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 03/24/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, this action is dismissed. All pending dates before this court are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 03/23/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Peterson of all remaining defendants |
| 03/10/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Mailed notice. |
| 03/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2). This case appears to involve the same parties and subject matter as case number 24-cv11630 assigned to the calendar of Judge Thomas M. Durkin and dismissed prior to the filing of this case. Mailed notice |
| 03/06/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon review of the plaintiff's supplemental declaration [11] in response to the Court's 2/26/25 order [7], the Court recommends to the Executive Committee that this case be returned to the calendar of Judge Durkin pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2). Although the civil cover sheet [3] indicates that this is "not a refiling of a previously dismissed action," the declaration reveals that the defendants in this case were all named in a previous, related suit (1:24-cv-11630) which was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. Pursuant to LR 40.3(b)(2), this action should therefore have been directly assigned to Judge Durkin. Mailed notice |
| 03/04/2025 | MEMORANDUM by David Peterson in support of motion for temporary restraining order[12] 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 2:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen 3:Declaration Declaration of Dan Lachman |
| 03/04/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff David Peterson for temporary restraining order |
| 03/04/2025 | DECLARATION of Dan Lachman regarding text entry, [7] |
| 03/04/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff David Peterson Revised Schedule A |
| 03/04/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff David Peterson to seal document sealed document[14] |
| 03/04/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff David Peterson for leave to file excess pages |
| 03/04/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff David Peterson Exhibit 2 附件： 1:(Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 4 of 4)) 2:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 3 of 4) 3:Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Part 2 of 4) |
| 03/04/2025 | MEMORANDUM by David Peterson in support of motion for temporary restraining order[12] 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 2:Declaration Declaration of David Peterson 3:Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen |
| 03/04/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff David Peterson for temporary restraining order |
| 03/04/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff David Peterson Supplemental Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 03/04/2025 | NEW PARTIES: David Peterson added to case caption. Terminating Peterson |
| 03/04/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Peterson against Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 02/27/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: On review of the complaint [1], the Court observes that the plaintiff is listed only as "Peterson" in the case caption. Because "[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties" in full, the plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint identifying himself by his full legal name. Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). The plaintiff need not file a new Schedule A. Mailed notice |
| 02/26/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [5] is granted. The unredacted version of Schedule A to the complaint [2], provisionally under seal pending order, is permitted to remain under seal for the time being. Mailed notice |
| 02/26/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: By 3/5/25, the plaintiff is required to file (1) a listing of all prior online trademark, copyright, or patent infringement cases (also known as "Schedule A" cases) filed in any court in the United States in which he was a plaintiff, and (2) a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that the plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Mailed notice |
| 02/25/2025 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
| 02/25/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 02/25/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
| 02/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Peterson to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 02/24/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Peterson by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 02/24/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 02/24/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Peterson Schedule A to Complaint |
| 02/24/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Peterson; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23124985. 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
