最近更新：2025-05-14
2023-cv-17065
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 05/14/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 05/13/2025 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/13/2025: The court has received plaintiff's status report. [78]. On 4/22/2025, the court ordered the parties to file a joint status report by 4/29/2025 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, [58], within the next two months. See [76]. The parties did not do so. The court sua sponte extended the deadline to submit a status report to 5/8/2025. Rather than submitting a joint status report with proposed dates, plaintiff submitted a status report indicating that on 5/8/2025that is, the day the status report was due-plaintiff "conferred with Defendant's counsel regarding a mutually agreeable date for oral argument on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss." [78] 11. Plaintiff did not provide any proposed dates. By 5/14/2025, the parties must file a status report proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss within the next two months. As this is the third time the court is directing a joint status report with proposed dates, if the parties fail to file a status report by that date, the court may conclude that plaintiff has lost interest in pursuing the case and may dismiss the case for want of prosecution and / or failure to comply with court orders. |
| 05/08/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 05/01/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: On 4/22/2025, the court ordered the parties to file a joint status report by 4/29/2025 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, within the next two months. See 76. The parties did not do so. By 5/8/2025, the parties must file a status report proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss within the next two months. As this is the second time the court is directing a joint status report, if the parties fail to file a status report by that date, the court may conclude that plaintiff has lost interest in pursuing the case and may dismiss the case for want of prosecution and / or failure to comply with court orders. |
| 04/22/2025 | ORDER: Telephone motion hearing held on 4/22/25. Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel, 74, is granted. Qi Men is granted leave to with his appearance. Sameeul Haque's appearance, 75, was filed on the docket in error and is hereby stricken. Qi Men and Sameeul Haque are terminated as counsel. Alexander Warden has already filed his appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 4/29/25 proposing dates for oral argument on defendant's motion to dismiss, 58, within the next two months. Each party will be given 30 minutes to argue the motion to dismiss, 58. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/22/2025: Mailed notice |
| 04/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Sameeul Haque |
| 04/16/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's oral motion to strike motion 71 because it was filed on the wrong docket is granted. Plaintiff's motion to withdraw as counsel, 71, is stricken. |
| 04/15/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone motion hearing on the pending motions to withdraw, 70, 71, is set for 4/22/2025 at 9:15 a.m. CT. To join the telephone hearing please dial 650-479-3207 and enter access code 2315 996 7380#. Press # when prompted for an attendee number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. |
| 04/10/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Alexander Warden |
| 04/10/2025 | MOTION by Attorney Qi Men to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided |
| 04/10/2025 | MOTION by Attorney Qi Men to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided |
| 03/26/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 03/20/2025 | STATUS Report Responsive to Plaintiff's Status Report 61 by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, guizhouwuminghanwang, guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi |
| 03/20/2025 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 03/20/2025 | ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw the appearance of Nicholas S. Lee as counsel of record 65 is granted. Nicholas S. Lee terminated. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/20/2025: Mailed notice |
| 03/20/2025 | MOTION by Attorney Nicholas S. Lee to withdraw as attorney for Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. No party information provided |
| 03/19/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Qi Men |
| 02/18/2025 | ORDER: Edward L. Bishop, Benjamin A. Campbell, and Sameeul Haque's motion to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co., Ltd., 62, is granted. Edward L. Bishop, Benjamin A. Campbell, and Sameeul Haque are terminated. All deadlines in this case are stayed through 3/20/2025 to allow plaintiff time to formalize representation with the remaining counsel of record, Nicholas S. Lee. By 3/20/2025, plaintiff should file a status report indicating whether it has formalized representation with the remaining counsel of record. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/18/2025: Mailed notice |
| 02/13/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd to withdraw as Counsel and Stay Deadlines |
| 01/30/2025 | REPLY by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 58 |
| 01/16/2025 | RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 58 附件： 1:(Declaration of Sameeul Haque) 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 12/27/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 12/17/2024 | MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi |
| 12/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's motion for leave to file excess pages 56 is granted. By 12/19/2024, defendant should re-file its motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the amended complaint and any supporting memorandum on the docket. Defendant's memorandum in support should not exceed 30 pages. Plaintiff's response is due by 1/16/2025 and should not exceed 30 pages. Defendant's reply, if any, is due by 1/30/2025 and should not exceed 20 pages. If the parties request any extension of the schedule, they should confer and file an agreed proposed schedule. |
| 12/10/2024 | MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages In Its Memo in Support of Its Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction and Dismiss the Complaint (Contested) |
| 11/20/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed plaintiff's response, 54, to the court's 11/1/2024 minute entry, 52, which directed plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299. For purposes of the show-cause order, the court finds that plaintiff has discharged its obligation to show that the joinder requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 299 and Rule 20 have been met. See Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-536 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 6, 2021) (Docket No. 14). |
| 11/08/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Supplemental Memorandum Regarding the Propriety of Joinder |
| 11/08/2024 | AMENDED Schedule A |
| 11/01/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum regarding the propriety of joinder. 50. Immediately prior to filing this memorandum, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed one of the defendants from the case, 49. Plaintiff has shown with respect to the remaining defendants that it has limited the claims to those based on "the same product" under 35 U.S.C. § 299. However, the "sameness of the accused products is not enough to establish that claims of infringement arise from the 'same transaction.'" In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012); see also Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Companies, Partnerships, & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 24-cv-607, 2024 WL 3338942, at *9 (N.D. Ill. July 9, 2024) (under Rule 20, "similar or even identical infringement by independent actors does not, standing alone, make infringement part of a common series of transactions or occurrences."). Plaintiff states that "[d]efendants, by selling identical products, either are the same entity or likely share a manufacturer or distributor, manufacturing or distributing the same infringing product." 50 at 3. Considering the cases cited above and the absence of other evidence supporting this contention, the court is not convinced. Plaintiff is ordered to file a supplemental memorandum by 11/15/2024 why this case should not be dismissed or severed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299 and under Rule 20. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 11/01/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 49, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendant No. 4 (DALEGDA Direct) from the case. But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cr. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendant No. 4 from the complaint, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended Schedule A form by 11/8/2024 identifying the remaining defendants. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 10/23/2024 | MEMORANDUM Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, terminate hearings, 48 by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 10/23/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Under Rule 41(a)(1) DALEGDA Direct (Defendant 4) without prejudice |
| 10/02/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The hearing set for 10/8/2024 is stricken. See 47. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by 10/23/2024 why this case should not be dismissed or severed for failure to comply with the joinder restrictions in 35 U.S.C. § 299. See Hu v. The Individuals, P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-05881, 9, 15, 23. Defendant Guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi's motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, 37, is denied without prejudice to refiling once the joinder issue has been resolved. |
| 10/01/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone motion hearing on defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi's motion to dissolve preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint 37 is set for 10/8/2024 at 8:45 a.m. CT. Dial toll-free call-in number (888) 684-9952; followed by the conference access code: 9482028#. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against recording and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violations of these prohibitions may result in sanction deemed necessary by the Court. |
| 06/11/2024 | RESPONSE by guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi in Support of MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 37 |
| 05/28/2024 | RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 37 附件： 1:(Declaration of Sameeul Haque) 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 05/03/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's motion for leave to file excess pages, 42, is granted. Defendant's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint has already been filed on the docket, 37. Plaintiff's response brief should not exceed 30 pages, and defendant's reply brief should not exceed 20 pages. The briefing schedule for the motion stands. See 41. |
| 05/03/2024 | RESPONSE by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltdin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages [CONTESTED/OPPOSED] 42 附件： 1:(Exhibit B) 2:Exhibit A |
| 05/02/2024 | MOTION by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi for leave to file excess pages [CONTESTED/OPPOSED] |
| 05/01/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed the parties' joint status report, 40. Defendant's motion, 37, violates Local Rule 7.1. By 5/3/2024 defendant is directed to either file a motion for leave to file excess pages or withdraw the motion and file a motion that complies with Local Rule 7.1. If defendant files a motion for leave to file excess pages, defendant should confer with plaintiff and include agreed proposed page limits for the response and reply briefs. Unless defendant withdraws the motion, plaintiff's response is due by 5/28/2024. Defendant's reply, if any, is due by 6/11/2024. |
| 04/29/2024 | STATUS Report (Joint) by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 04/25/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received defendant's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction and dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, 37, and plaintiff's status report, 38. By 4/29/2024, plaintiff and defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi should file a joint status report with an agreed proposed briefing schedule for the motion. The joint status report should also update the court on the status of settlement between the parties. |
| 04/23/2024 | STATUS Report by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 04/23/2024 | MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi 附件： 1:(Exhibit 5 - CN Priority Application) 2:Exhibit 4 - Lumen Couture 3:Exhibit 3 - UV Face Shield 4:Exhibit 2 - USD711008 5:Exhibit 1 - Photos 6:Declaration of Joseph Farco 7:Exhibit E - §§-§-015014312 8:Exhibit D - §-§ 9:Exhibit C - Retraction from Amazon 10:Exhibit B - Non-Infringement Statement 11:Exhibit A - Amazon Complaint 12:Declaration of Wumin Wang |
| 04/23/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi by Daniel Charles Leonardi |
| 04/23/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi by Timothy Edward Horton |
| 04/23/2024 | ORDER: Jospeh A. Farco's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of defendants guizhoujundeyangwangluokejiyouxiangongsi and guizhouwuminghanwangluokejiyouxiangongsi, 33, is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/23/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 04/22/2024 | MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21883373. |
| 04/18/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 4/23/2024, plaintiff should file a status report updating the court on the status of the case and proposed next steps. |
| 03/11/2024 | NEW PARTIES: DOE 1, DOE 2, guizhouwuminghanwang, DALEGDA Direct and LOUEBU added to case caption. |
| 03/08/2024 | ORDER : The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/8/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 03/08/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/8/2024: |
| 03/08/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has appeared or filed an objection to the motion for preliminary injunction, 24. A preliminary injunction is appropriate for the same reasons a TRO was granted and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 24 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Exhibit 1 to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. |
| 03/06/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 3/7/24, plaintiff should submit to the proposed order inbox a proposed preliminary injunction order and a redline in accordance with the court's standing orders. |
| 02/22/2024 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A on 2/20/2024, answer due 3/12/2024. 附件： 1:(Exhibit A to the Declaration) 2:Declaration of Kathryn Smith |
| 02/21/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 24 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 3/4/2024. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. For the reasons stated in the court's orders entering and extending the TRO, as well as in plaintiff's earlier motion 19 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. |
| 02/20/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd in support of motion for preliminary injunction 24 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1 to the Declaration) 2:Declaration of Sameeul Haque |
| 02/20/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd for preliminary injunction 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 02/20/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 02/12/2024 | ORDER EXTENDING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/12/2024: |
| 02/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons in the attached order, plaintiff's ex parte motion to extend the TRO, 19 is granted. The court's TRO, 17, entered on 1/26/24 is extended until 2/23/24. Enter Order extending TRO. |
| 02/06/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19 附件： 1:(Declaration of Sameeul Haque) |
| 02/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order |
| 02/05/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A |
| 01/31/2024 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd. (Document not Imaged) |
| 01/26/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/26/2024: |
| 01/26/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in the motions (3, 11, and 13) filed by plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd, the supporting memoranda, 12, and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 3, for electronic service of process 13, and for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery 11 are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and an injunction is in the public interest. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. As other judges in this district have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all defendants in this one action and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting, but at this preliminary stage, plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Clerk of Court ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), either cash or surety bond, as security. |
| 01/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for a TRO 11. However, plaintiff should comply with the standing order on the court's website and submit clean and track changes versions of the proposed order to the court's proposed order inbox. |
| 12/28/2023 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. |
| 12/28/2023 | Motion for Alternative Service by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 12/28/2023 | MEMORANDUM by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd in support of motion for temporary restraining order 11 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1 to the Declaration) 2:Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee |
| 12/28/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd for temporary restraining order |
| 12/26/2023 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 12/26/2023 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 12/26/2023 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category One). |
| 12/22/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Sameeul Haque |
| 12/22/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Benjamin Adam Campbell |
| 12/22/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd by Nicholas S. Lee |
| 12/22/2023 | Plaintiff's Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Patents or Trademarks by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 12/22/2023 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd |
| 12/22/2023 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd Schedule A to the Complaint 附件： 1:(Exhibit 6) 2:Exhibit 2 |
| 12/22/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd for leave to file certain documents under seal |
| 12/22/2023 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 12/22/2023 | COMPLAINT filed by Shenzhen Shining Bright Technology Co. Ltd; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21455210. 附件： 1:4 2:3 3:2 (Redacted) 4:1 5:Schedule A (Redacted) 6:5 7:(6 (Redacted)) |
