最近更新:2025-01-26
更新

2025-cv-00497

Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto

日期:01/15/2025

法院:伊利诺伊州北区法院

品牌:ROTITA女装

律所:Bayramoglu

日期 描述
04/16/2025 ORDER GRANTING EXPEDITED THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 4/16/2025. Mailed notice.
04/16/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for an order granting electronic service of process and expedited discovery (Dckt. No. [21]) is hereby granted. Order to follow. Mailed notice.
04/07/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery in Compliance with Docket 19
04/07/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The deadline to file a joint initial status report is extended to June 6, 2025. Mailed notice.
04/07/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication (Dckt. No. [9]) is hereby granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process under Rule 4(f)(3) is granted. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery from third parties is granted. Plaintiff's motion for a TRO is denied. Plaintiff failed to submit a proposed order to the proposed order inbox, in violation of this Court's Standing Order. Also, Plaintiff moved for a TRO over two months ago. Since that time, Plaintiff has not moved for the Court to expedite its ruling, and has not filed anything additional related to a TRO. But Plaintiff has filed voluntary dismissals in this case during that time. Based on the record, the Court finds that Plaintiff would not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a TRO. So the Court hereby finds that Plaintiff has not satisfied all of the requirements for a TRO under Rule 65(b). Similarly, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for an asset freeze. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend Schedule A to the complaint (Dckt. No. [13]) is hereby granted.Mailed notice.
04/02/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for excess pages (Dckt. No. [8]) is hereby granted. Mailed notice
03/17/2025 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited ONLY as to Defendant 8
03/02/2025 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited ONLY as to Defendant 1
02/20/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for leave to withdraw counsel of record (Dckt. No. [14]) is granted. Attorney Shawn Anthony Mangano is terminated as counsel of record. Mailed notice.
02/10/2025 MOTION by Attorney Shawn A. Mangano to withdraw as attorney for Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited. No party information provided
01/20/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to amend/correct MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order INCLUDING A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, A TEMPORARY ASSET RESTRAINT, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION [9], complaint, [1] Motion for Leave to Amend Schedule A to the Complaint and Exhibit 7 to the Temporary Restraining Order
附件:
1:Exhibit Amended Exhibit 7 to Temporary Restraining Order
2:Exhibit Amended Schedule A
01/20/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu
01/20/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu
01/20/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter
01/17/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order INCLUDING A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, A TEMPORARY ASSET RESTRAINT, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION
附件:
1:Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
2:Declaration of K. Kuhn in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order rega
3:Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
4:Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
5:Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
6:Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
7:Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
8:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn
9:Declaration of K. Kuhn in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
01/17/2025 MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for leave to file excess pages IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
01/16/2025 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by April 7, 2025. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice.
01/16/2025 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
01/16/2025 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
01/16/2025 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
01/15/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn
01/15/2025 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD by Shawn Anthony Mangano
01/15/2025 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
01/15/2025 CIVIL Cover Sheet
01/15/2025 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement filed by HONG KONG LEYUZHEN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22959014.
附件:
1:Exhibit 2 to the Complaint
2:Exhibit 1 to the Complaint

下载文件请联系电话或者加微信

18582579770