2020-cv-05047
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 04/18/2022 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 03/13/2022 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 08/02/2021 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 04/05/2021 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 04/05/2021 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 03/24/2021 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 01/25/2021 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 01/19/2021 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 01/18/2021 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 12/30/2020 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 12/29/2020 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 12/14/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 12/07/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 11/10/2020 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/10/2020. Notices mailed. |
| 11/10/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: No defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment through an appropriate pleading or appearance by counsel of record. The motion 29 is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's marks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. The infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants, the value of the plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the court concludes that $100,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Enter Final Judgment Order. Notices mailed. |
| 11/03/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 10/29/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for default judgment must be properly filed by 11/5/20. If no objections are filed, the motion will be considered unopposed. Notices mailed. |
| 10/28/2020 | MEMORANDUM by Sekiguchi Co., LTD. in support of motion for default judgment 29 附件: 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
| 10/28/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sekiguchi Co., LTD. for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A |
| 10/27/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 10/12/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs |
| 10/01/2020 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 10/1/2020. Notices mailed. |
| 10/01/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: No defendant has filed an appearance to object to the entry of a preliminary injunction. The motion is unopposed and for the same reasons the TRO was granted, a preliminary injunction is appropriate. The motion [20] is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. Notices mailed. |
| 09/23/2020 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. 附件: 1:Declaration of Service of Summons |
| 09/21/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Any objections to the motion for preliminary injunction must be filed by 9/28/20. If no objections are properly filed, the motion will be considered unopposed. Notices mailed. |
| 09/21/2020 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" on 9/21/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. 附件: 1:Declaration of Service of Summons |
| 09/21/2020 | MEMORANDUM by SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[20] 附件: 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1 to Declaration of KVogt |
| 09/21/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. for preliminary injunction |
| 09/10/2020 | INJUNCTION BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. |
| 09/09/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time [17] is granted, and the temporary restraining order is extended to 9/30/20. Notices mailed. |
| 09/09/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. for extension of time |
| 09/02/2020 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" |
| 09/02/2020 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/2/2020. Notices mailed. |
| 09/02/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to seal [7], motion for excess pages [8], and motion for a temporary restraining order, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process [9] are granted. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a strong likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement of plaintiff's intellectual property and sales into Illinois), the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. The court has doubts about the propriety of joinder and whether plaintiff genuinely intends to pursue an accounting (justifying an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage the court is persuaded that plaintiff has sufficient indicia of coordinated activity and prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze and joinder. A $10,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Notices mailed. |
| 07/10/2020 | Fifth Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on July 10, 2020. This Order does not extend or modify any deadlines set in civil cases. No motions may be noticed for in-person presentment; the presiding judge will notify parties of the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or in-court proceeding. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/10/2020. Mailed notice. |
| 08/28/2020 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 08/28/2020 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 08/27/2020 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. Sealed Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Satoshi Otani regarding memorandum in support of motion, 10 附件: 1:Exhibit 3, Part 1 2:Exhibit 3, Part 2 3:Exhibit 3, Part 3 4:Exhibit 3, Part 4 5:Exhibit 3, Part 5 6:Exhibit 3, Part 6 7:Exhibit 3, Part 7 |
| 08/27/2020 | MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 9 EX PARTE MOTION 附件: 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-6 to Declaration of KVogt 3:Declaration of Satoshi Otani 4:Declaration 1 to the Declaration of SOtani 5:Declaration 2 to the Declaration of SOtani |
| 08/27/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. for leave to file excess pages |
| 08/27/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal |
| 08/27/2020 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. |
| 08/27/2020 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. by Yi Bu |
| 08/27/2020 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. by Yanling Jiang |
| 08/27/2020 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. by Keith A. Vogt |
| 08/27/2020 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 08/27/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD. Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
| 08/27/2020 | COMPLAINT filed by SEKIGUCHI CO., LTD.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-17369204. 附件: 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:Exhibit 4 5:Exhibit 5 6:Exhibit 6 |